Dark Sentiments – Day 14

Posted By on October 14, 2010

Comments

6 Responses to “Dark Sentiments – Day 14”

  1. Kevin Bleuler says:

    In his book “Countess Dracula”, Tony Thorne gives a slightly different account of this story. According to his research the accusations against Elisabeth were greatly exaggerated. Though not exactly mild mannered, she was no more cruel to her servants and subjects than it was common for Eastern European nobility at that time. She was, however fiercly independent, extremely wealthy and after the death of her husband in control of a vast estate. Thorne claims – and presents impressive evidence for it – that the trial was based on evidence fabricated by her enemies to rob her of her wealth and power.

  2. Randy says:

    Thank you Kevin. A lot of what I read and otherwise absorbed in the course of preparing this article was contradictory and, in some cases, all about the shock value, but a lot carried over with enough consistency to indicate a kernel of that highly fluid thing we laughingly call “truth”. I agree with you that a setup by powerful enemies is absolutely not out of the question and, in the end, the kind of evil born of simple greed is a lot more likely to be at the root of things than a demented serial killer maintaining her youth through black magick rituals and sadosexual acts of torture.

    Allegedly, Erzsébet initially insisted that her victims be given Christian burials until local clergy refused to participate any further. She is also alleged to have enjoyed the complicity of a number of trusted servants and associates. Even in a time when people considered bear bating, torture, and executions to be spectator sports, the kind of things Erzsébet is claimed to have done to so many women over a period of years reminds me of the adage that history is written by the victor.

    Was it all made up by covetous rivals? Did she enjoy the help of so many people for so long out of their fearing the consequences of selling her out? Were they “appeasers” of the sort Winston Churchill identified as feeding an alligator in hopes that it will eat him last? Were they complicit at all or were they simply collateral damage trotted out to support trumped up charges? Whatever the truth, it’s a ripping yarn.

    Thanks again for your comment.

  3. Kevin Bleuler says:

    Agreed. I also like the Grand Guignol type story much better although considering the way the world works I would not really be surprised if it turned out to be a smokescreen to justify what was really motivated by plain greed. But ist’t it strange how such a story develops a life of its own over the centuries, fact being obscured by rumours, fiction slowly replacing documented history, events once real become the focus of fantasies and projections?

  4. Randy says:

    And movies. Let’s not forget movies.

  5. Kevin Bleuler says:

    Agreed again! Although I still opt for scepticism concerning historical authenticity I am grateful for the cinematic interpretations of the Countess with their dark erotic undertones. In fact your blog inspired me to dig into my DVD collection and rewatch Harry Kümmel’s “Sisters of Darkness”, that artsy Belgian movie from the 70’s, featuring Delphine Seyrig (of “Last Year in Marienbad” fame) as Countess Bathory. I also remember a cheap pulp horror novel I stumbled across as a teenager. It probably was of dubious literary quality and I guess I bought it because it showed a nude chick on the cover but the story about a reincarnated Erzsebet haunting the crypts and cellars beneath modern day Vienna inspired not only a lifelong love for that city but also an intense fascination with horror.

    By the way, I really like your blog..

  6. Randy says:

    Thanks for your kind comments and I’m glad to keep you coming back for more!

    In a future article I’ll be exploring the mixing of sex and violence in film and literature. There’s no denying it’s a winning combination, but the audience reaction to it is interestingly individual. Some enjoy slasher films – “horror” of the torture porn variety that represent what amounts to a snuff film they feel safe watching because they know it isn’t real.

    The best treatment of any film blending of sex with dark sentiments comes out of Europe, and once in a while out of a North American independent production company. When big money lays its hand on the genre you get movies like Exit to Eden, Body of Evidence, and Basic Instinct. Entertaining and all, but the darker side of sexuality always seems to be portrayed as the province of the crazed.Hollywood lacks the ability to address subjects such as those portrayed in, say, the “Beauty” series from the exquisite Anne Rice.

Leave a Reply to Kevin Bleuler